ABSTRACT
Introducción: La detección de genes asociados a virulencia en Helicobacter pylori constituye un buen marcadorgenético para predecir riesgo de enfermedades asociadas a la persistencia del patógeno. Objetivos: Determinar la prevalencia de cagA, vacA, babA2, iceA y dupA en pacientes chilenos, durante 10 años de seguimiento. Métodos: Se analizaron las biopsias gástricas de 1 577 pacientes (183 niños) obtenidas entre enero de 2003 y diciembre de 2007, mediante PCR convencional y cultivo bacteriano. En 374 individuos positivos se investigó la prevalencia de cagA, vacA (s1a, s1b, s2, m1, m2, i1 e i2), babA2, iceA (1 y 2) y dupA. Resultados: La prevalenciade H. pylori en adultos fue 48.7% y un 23.7% de los pacientes presentó más de un cepa bacteriana. La prevalenciapor genes fue: cagA 29.4%, vacAm1 52.7%, vacAm2 61.8%, vacAs1a 46.5%, vacAs1b 28.3%, vacAs2 41.7%, vacAi1 30.9%, vacAi2 12.0%, babA23.5%, iceA1 30.5%, iceA2 61.2% y dupA 28.9%. Se observó un 90% de concordancia en la prevalencia delos genes hpy, cagA, babA2, iceA e iceA2, y un 67.6% para vacAs1a, cuando se comparó biopsia y cultivo como fuente de ADN. Conclusiones: La mayoría de los genes de virulencia han mantenido su prevalencia en el tiempo,excepto vacAm1 y babA2 que la han aumentado. Sin embargo, la prevalencia de babA2 continúa siendo muy baja.
Background: Genes associated with virulence in Helicobacter pylori are good markers for prediction of risk of developing diseases due to persistent infection. Aim: To establish the prevalence of cagA, vacA, babA2,iceA and dupA among Chilean patients over a 10-year period. Methods: 1 577 gastric biopsies (183 children), collected from January 2003 to December 2007, were analyzed by conventional PCR and bacteriological culture. The prevalence of the genes cagA, vacA (s1a, s1b, s2, m1, m2, i1 and i2), babA2, iceA (1 and 2) and dupA were investigated in 374 positive individuals. Results: Prevalence of H. pylori in adults was 48.7%, with 23.7% of them presenting more than one infecting strain. Prevalence of genes was as follows: cagA 29.4%, vacAm152.7%, vacAm2 61.8%, vacAs1a 46.5%, vacAs1b 28.3%, vacAs2 41.7%, vacAi1 30.9%, vacAi2 12.0%, babA2 3.5%, iceA1 30.5%, iceA2 61.2% and dupA 28.9%. Ninety percent of agreement was observed in the prevalence of genes hpy, cagA, babA2, iceA and iceA2, by using DNA from both sources, but was only 67.6% for vacAs1a gene. Conclusion: The results suggest that all the genes conserved their prevalence in this period with the exception of vacAm1 and babA2, in which there was increased prevalence. Nonetheless, the prevalence of the gene babA2 continues to be very low.